After a six-week trial in which Johnny Depp and Amber Heard tore apart over the nasty details of their short marriage, both parties told a jury the exact same thing on Friday — they want their lives back.
Heard “ruined her life by falsely telling the world that she was a survivor of domestic violence at the hands of Mr. Depp,” Depp’s attorney Camille Vasquez told the jury during closing arguments in her defamation lawsuit against his ex-wife.
Heard’s lawyers, meanwhile, say Depp ruined Heard’s life by launching a smear campaign against her when she divorced him and publicly accused him of assault in 2016.
“In Mr. Depp’s world, you don’t leave Mr. Depp,” said Heard’s attorney, J. Benjamin Rottenborn. “If you do, he will launch a worldwide campaign of humiliation against you.”
Depp hopes the trial will help restore his reputation, even if it has turned into a vicious wedding spectacle, with broadcast cameras in the courtroom capturing every twist for an increasingly delighted audience as fans were weighing in on social media and lining up overnight for coveted courtroom seats.
“This case for Mr. Depp was never about the money,” said Depp’s attorney, Benjamin Chew. “It’s about Mr. Depp’s reputation and his release from the prison he’s lived in for six years.”
Depp is suing Heard for $50 million in Fairfax County Circuit Court in Virginia over a 2018 op-ed she wrote in The Washington Post describing herself as “a public figure representing domestic violence.” His lawyers say he was defamed by the article even though he never mentioned his name.
Heard has filed a $100 million counterclaim against the former ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ star after his lawyer called his allegations a hoax. Although the counterclaim received less attention at trial, Heard’s attorney, Elaine Bredehoft, said it offered the jury a way to compensate Heard for the abuse Depp inflicted on her even after they split. by orchestrating a smear campaign.
“We’re asking you to finally hold this man accountable,” she told the jury. “He never accepted responsibility for anything in his life.”
The seven-person civil jury began deliberations at 3 p.m. Friday and wrapped up for the day about two hours later. They will resume on Tuesday.
Depp says he never hit Heard and she concocted the abuse allegations. He said he was the one who was physically attacked by Heard on multiple occasions.
“There’s an assailant in this courtroom, but it’s not Mr. Depp,” Vasquez said.
During the trial, Heard testified to more than a dozen episodes of physical and sexual assaults that she claims Depp inflicted on her.
Vasquez, in her conclusion, noted that Heard had to revise her testimony about the first time she said she was hit. Heard said Depp hit her after she inadvertently mocked one of his tattoos. Heard first said it happened in 2013 – after a fairy tale year of dating and romance – but later corrected herself to say it happened in 2012, very early in their relationship .
“Now in this courtroom she has suddenly erased an entire year of magic,” Vasquez said.
Jurors saw several photos of Heard with marks and bruises on her face, but some photos show only mild redness, and others show more severe bruising.
Vasquez accused Heard of doctoring the photos and said evidence that Heard had embellished some of his wounds is proof that all of his abuse allegations are baseless.
“Either you believe everything or nothing,” she said. “Either she is the victim of horrible and ugly abuse, or she is a woman who is ready to say absolutely anything.”
In Heard’s conclusion, Rottenborn said critics of Heard’s abuse evidence ignored the fact that there was overwhelming evidence in her name and sent a dangerous message to victims of domestic violence.
“If you didn’t take pictures, it didn’t happen,” Rottenborn said. “If you took pictures, they’re fake. If you didn’t tell your friends, they’re lying. If you told your friends, they’re part of the hoax.”
And he rejected Vasquez’s suggestion that if the jury thinks Heard might embellish a single act of abuse, they should ignore everything she says. He said Depp’s defamation suit must fail if Heard suffers even one incident of abuse.
“They’re trying to make you think Amber has to be perfect to win,” Rottenborn said.
When the jury deliberates, they will need to focus not only on whether there was abuse, but also on whether Heard’s opinion piece can be considered legally defamatory. The article itself focuses primarily on the political issues of domestic violence, but Depp’s lawyer points to two passages from the article, as well as an online headline that they claim defames Depp.
In the first passage, Heard writes that “two years ago I became a public figure representing domestic violence, and felt the full force of our culture’s anger.” Depp’s lawyers call it a clear reference to Depp, given that Heard publicly accused Depp of domestic violence in 2016 – two years before she wrote the article.
In a second passage, she says, “I had the rare vantage point of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse.”
The online title reads “Amber Heard: I spoke out against sexual violence and faced the wrath of our culture”.
“She didn’t mention her name. She didn’t have to,” Chew said. “Everyone knew exactly who and what Ms. Heard was talking about.”
Heard’s lawyers said Heard could not be held responsible for the headline because she did not write it, and that the two passages in the article were not about the abuse allegations themselves, but about how the Heard’s life had changed after she made them.
Rottenborn told jurors that while they tended to believe Depp’s claim that he never abused Heard, he still couldn’t win his case because Heard had the right to weigh in on the issues for debate. public under the First Amendment.